Unit 1 · Review & revision
Collected results, derivations, definitions, and problems.
How the ideas fit together
A constraint limits possible configurations or velocities. For regular independent holonomic constraints, count the remaining configuration degrees of freedom and choose that many independent generalized coordinates. Use transformations to obtain particle positions. The chain rule then gives physical velocity; a fixed-time variation gives virtual displacement. Force projected onto that virtual displacement defines generalized force. Ideal reactions disappear from total virtual work. Static balance gives the virtual-work principle; Newtonian dynamical balance gives D’Alembert's principle.
This is one chain of reasoning. If the final equation feels arbitrary, locate the earliest step you cannot explain and revisit its chapter. Do not replace that gap with memorization.
Unit 1 formula sheet
| Formula | Meaning and symbols | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| particles, independent constraints, configuration freedoms | Regular independent holonomic equality constraints in 3D | |
| Position of particle in independent coordinates | Valid local transformation | |
| Physical velocity, including explicit transport | Differentiable transformation | |
| Velocity coefficient equals coordinate response | Position depends on , not | |
| Useful mixed-derivative identity | Smooth transformations; partial derivative holds velocities fixed | |
| Actual differential along motion | Chain rule | |
| Virtual displacement | Fixed time; holonomic coordinate description | |
| Linearized constraint on a virtual variation | Smooth equality constraint at fixed time | |
| Virtual work of specified forces | Admissible infinitesimal comparison | |
| Generalized force conjugate to | Defined through virtual work | |
| Definition of ideal reaction system | Must hold for every admissible virtual variation | |
| , hence | Static equilibrium in generalized coordinates | Independent variations; ideal bilateral regular constraints; reaction availability |
| Conservative generalized force | Forces represented by potential | |
| D’Alembert's principle | Constant masses, inertial frame, ideal constraints | |
| Independent-coordinate dynamical equation | Additional independence of generalized variations |
Here abbreviates , and abbreviates the explicit-time derivative. These abbreviations do not introduce new physical quantities.
Derivation index
| Derivation | Location |
|---|---|
| Degrees-of-freedom counting and assumptions | Chapter 2, Section 2 |
| Generalized velocity formula | Chapter 4, Section 2 |
| Two generalized derivative identities | Chapter 4, Section 3 |
| Actual and virtual constraint differentials | Chapter 4, Section 4 |
| Generalized-force formula | Chapter 5, Section 2 |
| Virtual-work principle | Chapter 5, Section 4 |
| Conservative generalized force | Chapter 5, Section 5 |
| D’Alembert's principle | Chapter 6, Section 2 |
| Generalized-coordinate dynamical form | Chapter 6, Section 3 |
| Atwood and pendulum equations | Chapter 6, Section 4 |
Definition index
| Term | Precise working definition |
|---|---|
| Actual displacement | Infinitesimal position change along an actual trajectory over elapsed time |
| Admissible variation | Infinitesimal comparison consistent with the specified instantaneous constraints |
| Bilateral constraint | Equality restriction with locally two-sided allowed variations within its surface |
| Configuration | Complete specification of particle positions at an instant |
| Configuration space | Set of all admissible configurations; one point represents one complete arrangement |
| Constraint | Restriction on admissible positions, velocities, or both |
| Constraint force | Reaction associated with enforcing the modeled restriction |
| D’Alembert's principle | Zero total virtual work of applied forces minus momentum rates under ideal constraints |
| Degree of freedom | One independent parameter needed to specify configuration locally |
| Generalized coordinate | Independent parameter used to label admissible configurations |
| Generalized force | Coefficient of a generalized variation in virtual work |
| Generalized velocity | Time derivative of a generalized coordinate |
| Holonomic constraint | Restriction expressible or integrable into a position-and-time equality |
| Ideal constraint | Constraint whose reaction system has zero total virtual work for all admissible variations |
| Non-holonomic constraint | Restriction not reducible to an equivalent position-and-time equality; the main examples here are non-integrable velocity restrictions |
| Rheonomous constraint | Constraint with explicit time dependence in the chosen description |
| Scleronomous constraint | Constraint without explicit time dependence in the chosen description |
| Transformation equations | Relations giving physical particle positions from generalized coordinates and time |
| Unilateral constraint | One-sided restriction, commonly represented by an inequality |
| Virtual displacement | Infinitesimal admissible configuration change at fixed time |
| Virtual work | Sum of force dot virtual-displacement products |
| Virtual-work principle | Applied-force virtual work vanishes for every admissible variation in equilibrium under the stated ideal-constraint assumptions |
A reliable problem-solving method
- Specify the physical model. Fixed support or moving support? Smooth or rough? Rod or string? Prescribed motion or a dynamical unknown?
- Count and choose. Identify independent constraints, count freedoms, and select coordinates.
- Define conventions. Draw axes, positive directions, angles, and reference lengths.
- Write transformations. Verify that the positions satisfy the constraints.
- Construct virtual displacements. Hold time fixed and keep admissibility explicit.
- Identify forces. Separate applied forces from reactions, then justify which reaction works vanish or cancel.
- Choose equilibrium or dynamics. Use virtual work for static equilibrium and D’Alembert for motion.
- Collect independent variations. Set their coefficients to zero only when independence is justified.
- Interpret and check. Verify dimensions, signs, special cases, and tension/contact conditions.
Unit 1 problems
These problems connect constraint geometry, virtual work, and equations of motion. Attempt them before consulting the formula sheet. Separate hints and solutions follow the chapter solutions.
R1 · Translating circular hoop. A bead is threaded on a horizontal circular hoop of fixed radius , whose centre translates as , . Write the constraints in three dimensions, classify them, count freedoms, and give transformations.
R2 · Configuration degrees of freedom. Compare the freedoms of a free planar particle, a pendulum with prescribed changing length, a pendulum with dynamically variable length, and a planar double pendulum. Explain every count.
R3 · Ideal reactions and actual power. For the translating hoop of R1, derive physical velocity and virtual displacement. With a radial reaction of signed magnitude , show that its virtual work vanishes while its actual power need not.
R4 · Spring equilibrium on an incline. Prove the virtual-work principle from static force balance and define every assumption. Apply it to a mass on a smooth incline supported by an uphill spring of stiffness , using extension measured down the slope. Find equilibrium extension.
R5 · Dynamics of connected masses. Derive D’Alembert's principle and use it for an Atwood machine with masses and . Find acceleration and string tension with .
R6 · Coordinate and velocity identities. Derive the generalized velocity formula and the two associated derivative identities. Explain why holds coordinates fixed even though a real trajectory relates coordinate and velocity.
R7 · Motion on a helical wire. A bead slides on a smooth fixed helix under downward gravity. Derive its equation for using D’Alembert's principle. Interpret the case .
R8 · Constraint models and admissibility. Critique these claims: “Every velocity restriction is non-holonomic”; “ideal constraint forces never do work”; “zero virtual work for one variation proves equilibrium.” Give a counterexample or the missing condition for each.
Reviewing the physical argument
Begin by stating the definitions and the distinctions between them. Next reproduce the velocity and virtual-work derivations without looking. Then solve the pendulum and Atwood problems from a blank diagram. Finish by explaining the moving-wire counterexample and the independence requirement aloud.
If you only remember formulas, use the Physical Meaning paragraphs to rebuild the argument. If you understand the ideas but make errors, use the worked examples to practise signs and derivatives. If you can solve familiar systems, try R7 and Problem 6.16 to test transfer to a new constraint geometry.
From constrained motion to Lagrangian mechanics
You should now be able to explain and calculate each of these without guessing: independent coordinates; explicit time dependence; actual versus virtual displacement; generalized force and its units; ideal-reaction elimination; static versus dynamical balance; and the limitations of independent-variation arguments.
Unit 2 organizes the same mechanics through kinetic and potential energy. The full derivation of Lagrange’s equations is optional under the syllabus; their meaning and applications are developed in the main chapters.